From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gordon v. Urbahns

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 7, 2012
Case No. 12-13724 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-13724

11-07-2012

FRED GORDON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHN URBAHNS, Defendant.


HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS (#12) AS MOOT

On August 22, 2012, plaintiffs filed this action against defendant alleging breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, contribution, and violations of Michigan statutes. On October 8, 2012, defendant filed a motion to dismiss. On October 29, 2012, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B) allows a plaintiff to amend her complaint without leave within twenty-one days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b). The court believes the pending motion to dismiss is moot in light of the new pleading. Defendant may file a new motion within the applicable time limit. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice as moot.

______________________

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE


Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

November 7, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.


Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Gordon v. Urbahns

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 7, 2012
Case No. 12-13724 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Gordon v. Urbahns

Case Details

Full title:FRED GORDON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHN URBAHNS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 7, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-13724 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 7, 2012)