Our instructions in this regard are not to be interpreted as a finding by this Court that Beamon's unaddressed claims have been sufficiently pleaded. See, generally, Gordon v. State, 987 So.2d 1181, 1183 (Ala.Crim.App.2006) (holding that, when claims were sufficiently pleaded, the circuit court's failure to specifically address the claims required a remand). Citing McNabb v. State, 991 So.2d 313, 334–35 (Ala.Crim.App.
See also Minor v. State, 627 So.2d 1071 (Ala.Crim.App. 1992)." Gordon v. State, 987 So.2d 1181, 1182 (Ala.Crim.App. 2006) (quoting Gilmore v. State, 937 So.2d 547, 550-51 (Ala.Crim.App. 2005)). In the above cases, the defendant pleaded guilty because trial counsel incorrectly represented to the defendant that the defendant would receive a certain sentence upon pleading guilty or pleaded guilty because counsel incorrectly informed the defendant of the collateral results of his entering a guilty plea.