From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gordon v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 31, 2020
Case No.: 2:19-cv-01046-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Mar. 31, 2020)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:19-cv-01046-GMN-EJY

03-31-2020

STEPHANIE GORDON, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah, (ECF No. 6), which recommends that Plaintiff's action, docketed as 2:19-cv-01046-GMN-EJY, be dismissed with prejudice and that the Clerk of the Court be instructed to close this case and enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiff has failed to update her address with the Court pursuant to Local Rule IA 3-1, which provides that failure to comply may result in "the dismissal of the action, entry of default judgment, or other sanctions as deemed appropriate by the court." D. Nev. Local R. IA 3-1.

A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge's report and recommendation where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003).

Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 6), is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's action, docketed as 2:19-cv-01046-GMN-EJY, is DISMISSED with prejudice.

The Clerk of Court shall close this case and enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 31 day of March, 2020.

/s/_________

Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Gordon v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 31, 2020
Case No.: 2:19-cv-01046-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Mar. 31, 2020)
Case details for

Gordon v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:STEPHANIE GORDON, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Acting Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 31, 2020

Citations

Case No.: 2:19-cv-01046-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Mar. 31, 2020)