From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gordon v. Patchogue Surgical Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1995
222 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 29, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (O'Shaughnessy, J.H.O.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

After a trial, the Supreme Court determined that the plaintiff had been discharged without cause from his position as Chief Executive Officer and President of the corporate defendants in violation of a written contract between the parties. The court awarded the plaintiff damages of $250,445.33 and 2,785,200 shares of stock. On appeal, the appellants argue that the court's finding that the plaintiff was discharged without cause is erroneous. The appellants contend that the plaintiff's discharge was for cause because the plaintiff withdrew some money from a corporate account for his personal use. The plaintiff contends that he earned, but was not paid, the money in question, pursuant to an oral contract with the defendants. The appellants contend that the oral contract was extinguished by the merger clause in the subsequently executed written contract between the parties. However, since this argument was not raised by the appellants at trial, it is not properly before this Court. In any event, the two contracts concerned different subject matters. Therefore, the merger clause in the written contract did not extinguish the oral contract ( see, 22 N.Y. Jur 2d, Contracts, § 419; Frohman Amusement Corp. v Blinkhorn, 178 App. Div. 431). Balletta, J.P., O'Brien, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gordon v. Patchogue Surgical Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1995
222 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Gordon v. Patchogue Surgical Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH GORDON, Respondent, v. PATCHOGUE SURGICAL CO., INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
636 N.Y.S.2d 107

Citing Cases

Dialcom, LLC v. AT&T Corp.

Such argument is rejected. The merger clause at issue is only operative with respect to prior negotiations…

Wattenberg v. Wattenberg

The Post-Nuptial Agreement, which concerns the issue of distribution of the parties' property and which was…