See Fla.App. Rule 4.6(a). Cf., Dees v. State, 295 So.2d 296 (Fla. 1974); Gordon v. Norris, 90 So.2d 914 (Fla. 1956). Admittedly, the question is without controlling precedent in this state.

" F.A.R. 4.6 may not be utilized for the purpose of apprising private litigants on the nature or extent of what their claims should or should not be, especially when it might involve the rights of a person or persons who are not parties to the cause, which might well be the case here. Gordon v. Norris, Fla. 1957, 90 So.2d 914; Dade County v. Philbrick, supra. In accordance with the foregoing, we must decline to answer the questions so certified, and remand the cause back to the trial Court for further proceedings.

Answer to questions (b) and (c) of the Certificate is declined as the statement of facts presented with reference to these questions does not produce a single determinative question of law, the answer to which would be dispositive of the cause. Gordon v. Norris, Fla. 1956, 90 So.2d 914. Question answered as to (a) in the negative; answer declined as to questions (b) and (c).