From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gordon v. Hollen

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jun 10, 2008
08-cv-336-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 10, 2008)

Opinion

08-cv-336-bbc.

June 10, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner Gregory Gordon, an inmate at the Bayfield County Jail in Bayfield, Wisconsin, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Having considered petitioner's affidavit of indigency, I find that he is unable to prepay the fees of commencing this action or to post security therefor, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, petitioner's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

I also note that petitioner named the Attorney General for the State of Wisconsin and the County of Bayfield as respondents to the petition. In a habeas action filed by a state prisoner, the proper respondent is the state officer having custody of the prisoner and the attorney general for the state where the judgment was entered. Rule 2 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Those people are J.B. Van Hollen, Attorney General for the State of Wisconsin and Bayfield County Sheriff Robert K. Follis. I have revised the caption to show the correct respondents and direct the clerk of court to do the same.


Summaries of

Gordon v. Hollen

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jun 10, 2008
08-cv-336-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 10, 2008)
Case details for

Gordon v. Hollen

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY GORDON, Petitioner, v. J.B. VAN HOLLEN, Attorney General, State of…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Jun 10, 2008

Citations

08-cv-336-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 10, 2008)