From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gordon v. Hodge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION
Feb 12, 2013
Case No. 13-cv-1003 (C.D. Ill. Feb. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 13-cv-1003

02-12-2013

JAMES GORDON, Petitioner, v. MARC HODGE, Warden, Lawrence Correctional Center, Respondent.


ORDER & OPINION

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1). Petitioner was ordered to file a supplemental brief providing basic facts necessary for Respondent to respond to two of his claims, or face dismissal of these claims. (Order & Opinion, Doc. 9 at 5-6). The claims are 1) Count IX, a claim of a coerced guilty plea, and 2) the argument that recordings of his conversations with a fellow inmate violated his Sixth Amendment rights, which was not a separately enumerated count. Petitioner failed to file the ordered brief despite having been given ample time to respond. Therefore, the two claims listed above are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

JOE BILLY McDADE

United States Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Gordon v. Hodge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION
Feb 12, 2013
Case No. 13-cv-1003 (C.D. Ill. Feb. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Gordon v. Hodge

Case Details

Full title:JAMES GORDON, Petitioner, v. MARC HODGE, Warden, Lawrence Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION

Date published: Feb 12, 2013

Citations

Case No. 13-cv-1003 (C.D. Ill. Feb. 12, 2013)