Opinion
SC: 164611 COA: 359658
03-10-2023
John Richard GORDON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jennifer Marie GORDON, Defendant-Appellant.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's November 4, 2022 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
Bolden, J. (concurring).
I concur in the Court's decision to deny defendant's motion for reconsideration because defendant has not shown palpable error and, therefore, has not met the procedural threshold for reconsideration. However, I also share the concerns raised by the concurrence to our order denying appellant's application for leave to appeal in Gordon v Gordon , ––– Mich ––––, 980 N.W.2d 724 (2022) ( MCCORMACK , C.J., concurring), which highlights the unique challenges self-represented litigants face when participating in the civil justice system.