From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gordon v. Broussard

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Oct 27, 2005
No. 09-05-375 CV (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2005)

Opinion

No. 09-05-375 CV

Opinion Delivered October 27, 2005.

On Appeal from the 172nd District Court, Jefferson County, Texas, Trial Cause No. E-173255.

Vacated and Remanded.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., GAULTNEY and KREGER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


We have before the Court an "Agreed Motion for Reversal and Remand for New Trial." The appellant, Charles Gordon, and the appellee, Daniel Broussard, asks this Court to vacate the judgment of the trial court, remand the cause for new trial and release the surety, The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania. The Court finds the motion complies with Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(2).

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the judgment of the trial court is vacated and the cause is remanded to the 172nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas, for further proceedings on the merits of the case. Costs are assessed against the appellant, and the obligations of The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania on appellant's supersedeas bond are discharged.


Summaries of

Gordon v. Broussard

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Oct 27, 2005
No. 09-05-375 CV (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2005)
Case details for

Gordon v. Broussard

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES GORDON, Appellant, v. DANIEL BROUSSARD, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Oct 27, 2005

Citations

No. 09-05-375 CV (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2005)