Opinion
Argued October 8, 1991
Decided November 25, 1991
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Vincent G. Bradley, J.
Elliot Paskoff, Avrom E. Greenberg and Francis J. Hearn, Jr., for appellant.
Jerry A. Weiss for respondents.
MEMORANDUM.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment denied.
Inasmuch as a triable issue of fact exists as to whether plaintiffs, who claim to have acquired title to defendant's property by adverse possession, acknowledged during the statutory 10-year period that actual ownership of the property rested with defendant, summary judgment should not have been awarded to plaintiffs. Such a concession, if found by the trier of fact to exist, would negate an essential element of plaintiffs' adverse possession claim, namely, that they continued to possess the property under a claim of right throughout the statutory period (see, City of Tonawanda v Ellicott Cr. Homeowners Assn., 86 A.D.2d 118, 123; see also, Van Valkenburgh v Lutz, 304 N.Y. 95, 99).
Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur in memorandum.
Order reversed, etc.