Opinion
CIVIL 23-3527
05-09-2024
SHERRY ANN GOOLD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DANIEL OPREA, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
HON. KAI N. SCOTT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
AND NOW, this 9th day of May 2024, upon consideration of Defendant Magisterial District Judge Brian Marriott's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9), Defendants Upper Southampton Township and Upper Southampton Township Police Department's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11), and Defendants Daniel and Mary Rose Oprea's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 24), along with Plaintiffs' Responses in Opposition (ECF Nos. 12, 14, 25, 26, 27), it is hereby ORDERED that for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 9, 11, and 24) are GRANTED and this case is dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiffs elect to amend their Complaint, they must do so within thirty (30) days of this Order. If Plaintiffs do not do so, this Court will dismiss this case with prejudice.
BY THE COURT: