From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Google LLC v. Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jun 15, 2022
No. 2021-1545 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 15, 2022)

Opinion

2021-1545

06-15-2022

GOOGLE LLC, Appellant v. REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC, Appellee

Naveen Modi, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by Phillip W. Citroen, Stephen Blake Kinnaird, Joseph Palys, Daniel Zeilberger. Paul Anthony Kroeger, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by, Reza Mirzaie, James S. Tsuei, Philip Wang.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-01033.

Naveen Modi, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by Phillip W. Citroen, Stephen Blake Kinnaird, Joseph Palys, Daniel Zeilberger.

Paul Anthony Kroeger, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by, Reza Mirzaie, James S. Tsuei, Philip Wang.

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

Lourie, Prost, and Taranto, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Google LLC v. Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jun 15, 2022
No. 2021-1545 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Google LLC v. Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC

Case Details

Full title:GOOGLE LLC, Appellant v. REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 15, 2022

Citations

No. 2021-1545 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 15, 2022)