From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodyear Synthetic Rubber Corp. v. Woldman

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 25, 1953
110 N.E.2d 778 (Ohio 1953)

Opinion

No. 33342

Decided February 25, 1953.

Supreme Court — No revisory jurisdiction — Of administrative orders of Director of Industrial Relations.

PETITION to vacate order.

ON MOTION to dismiss.

The Goodyear Synthetic Rubber Corporation brought this action originally in this court, seeking to have "set aside, vacated and held for naught," as unlawful and unreasonable, an order of the Director of Industrial Relations requiring Goodyear to make certain alterations and additions and to install certain equipment and devices in a synthetic rubber plant which it is operating.

A motion by the director and the Department of Industrial Relations "that the petition be dismissed for the reason that the court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action" presents the issue whether the Supreme Court has revisory jurisdiction of administrative orders of the Director of Industrial Relations.

Messrs. Vorys, Sater, Seymour Pease, for plaintiff.

Mr. C. William O'Neill, attorney general, and Mr. kiehner Johnson, for defendant.


This court does not have revisory jurisdiction of administrative orders of the Director of Industrial Relations. The motion to dismiss the petition is sustained and the petition is dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN and STEWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Goodyear Synthetic Rubber Corp. v. Woldman

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 25, 1953
110 N.E.2d 778 (Ohio 1953)
Case details for

Goodyear Synthetic Rubber Corp. v. Woldman

Case Details

Full title:GOODYEAR SYNTHETIC RUBBER CORP. v. WOLDMAN, DIR., ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Feb 25, 1953

Citations

110 N.E.2d 778 (Ohio 1953)
110 N.E.2d 778

Citing Cases

Nielsen v. Ford Motor Co.

This determination by the Chief Examiner is not the result of an adjudicatory or quasijudicial hearing, which…