From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodwin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 5, 1926
282 S.W. 1118 (Tex. Crim. App. 1926)

Opinion

No. 10220.

Delivered May 5, 1926.

Theft by Conversion — No Statement of Facts — No Bills of Exception.

There being neither a statement of facts, nor bills of exception in this record, and no fundamental errors appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Dallas County. Tried below before the Hon. Felix D. Robertson, Judge.

Appeal from a conviction of theft by conversion of an automobile, penalty two years in the penitentiary.

No brief filed for appellant.

Sam D. Stinson, State's Attorney, and Robert M. Lyles, Assistant State's Attorney, for the State.


Conviction is for theft by conversion of an automobile, the punishment is two years in the penitentiary.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Goodwin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 5, 1926
282 S.W. 1118 (Tex. Crim. App. 1926)
Case details for

Goodwin v. State

Case Details

Full title:A. F. GOODWIN v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: May 5, 1926

Citations

282 S.W. 1118 (Tex. Crim. App. 1926)
282 S.W. 1118