Opinion
No. ED 107175
12-10-2019
Phillip T. GOODWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
FOR APPELLANT, Mary S. Choi, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101. For Respondent, Eric Schmitt, Justin Moody, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
FOR APPELLANT, Mary S. Choi, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
For Respondent, Eric Schmitt, Justin Moody, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Roy L. Richter, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM Phillip T. Goodwin ("Movant") appeals from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was charged as a prior and persistent offender with fourteen counts of second-degree robbery, a class B felony, in violation of Section 569.030, RSMo. On October 5, 2016, Movant entered a "blind" guilty plea to all fourteen charges, and on December 1, 2016, he was sentenced to a term of 23 years’ imprisonment on each count, those terms to run concurrently for a total of 23 years. On April 13, 2017, Movant filed his pro se motion for post-conviction relief, and on August 15, 2018, the motion court issued its findings of fact and conclusions of law, denying Movant’s motion and request for an evidentiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).