From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodwin v. McKinney

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Oct 4, 2021
21-CV-01672 (JMA)(JMW) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-01672 (JMA)(JMW)

10-04-2021

ALIE GOODWIN, 2020001974, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER MCKINNEY, Badge #294; CORRECTIONS OFFICER LUPEWIG, Defendants.


ORDER

JOAN M. AZRACK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Before the Court is the application to proceed in forma pauperis filed by incarcerated pro se plaintiff Alie Goodwin (“plaintiff”) in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) against Nassau County Corrections Officers McKinney and Lupewig (together, “defendants”). (See ECF Nos. 1, 6.) Upon review of the declarations accompanying plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court finds that plaintiff's financial status qualifies him to commence this action without prepayment of the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, the Court grants plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and orders service of the summonses and complaint upon the defendants by the United States Marshal Service (“USMS”) forthwith.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Order to the plaintiff at his last known address.

SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Goodwin v. McKinney

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Oct 4, 2021
21-CV-01672 (JMA)(JMW) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Goodwin v. McKinney

Case Details

Full title:ALIE GOODWIN, 2020001974, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER MCKINNEY…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Oct 4, 2021

Citations

21-CV-01672 (JMA)(JMW) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2021)