From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodwin v. Hamil

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Aug 28, 2017
CASE NO. 17-5183 RJB DWC (W.D. Wash. Aug. 28, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 17-5183 RJB DWC

08-28-2017

PHILLIP GOODWIN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN HAMIL, LIN-MARIE NACHT, HOLLI CORYELL, ELENA LOPEZ and BRUCE SHAMULKA, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND RE-REFERRING CASE

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. Dkt. 27. The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation, objections, and the remaining record.

Plaintiff, a civil detainee housed at the Special Commitment Center, brings this case asserting that his constitutional rights were violated. Dkt. 4. Plaintiff's complaint is not wholly clear. To the extent that Plaintiff asserts tort claims under state law for negligence and medical malpractice, the Defendants move to dismiss those claims because Plaintiff failed to file the requisite tort claim notice before commencing this case. Dkt. 18. The facts and procedural history are in the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 27) and are adopted here. The Report and Recommendation recommends granting the motion and dismissing the state law torts without prejudice. Id.

For the reasons stated therein, the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 27) should be adopted and the Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. 18) granted. Plaintiff's objections (Dkt. 29) do not provide a basis to reject the Report and Recommendation. They are a repetition of his prior arguments and misunderstand the nature of the Defendants' motion. Further, although it appears Plaintiff may be dismissing all claims to damages, that is not entirely clear.

This matter should be re-referred to Magistrate Judge Christel for further proceedings. In particular, to the extent Plaintiff moves for a temporary stay of the case (Dkt. 29) that motion should be re-referred to Judge Christel.

It is ORDERED that:

• The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 27) IS ADOPTED;

• The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 18) IS GRANTED;

• To the extent Plaintiff asserts state law claims for negligence or medical malpractice, those claims ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

• The case IS RE-REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christel for further proceedings. In particular, to the extent Plaintiff moves for a temporary stay of the case (Dkt. 29) that motion is re-referred to Judge Christel.

The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to any party appearing pro se at said party's last known address.

Dated this 28th day of August, 2017.

/s/_________

ROBERT J. BRYAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Goodwin v. Hamil

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Aug 28, 2017
CASE NO. 17-5183 RJB DWC (W.D. Wash. Aug. 28, 2017)
Case details for

Goodwin v. Hamil

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP GOODWIN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN HAMIL, LIN-MARIE NACHT, HOLLI CORYELL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Aug 28, 2017

Citations

CASE NO. 17-5183 RJB DWC (W.D. Wash. Aug. 28, 2017)