From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodwin v. Hamil

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Jul 31, 2017
No. 3:17-CV-05183-RJB-DWC (W.D. Wash. Jul. 31, 2017)

Opinion

No. 3:17-CV-05183-RJB-DWC

07-31-2017

PHILLIP GOODWIN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN HAMIL, LIN-MARIE NACHT, HOLLI CORYELL, ELENA LOPEZ, BRUCE SHAMULKA, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge David W. Christel and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 27).

(2) Defendants Hamil, Coryell, and Lopez's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 18) is granted.

(3) Plaintiff's state tort law claims of negligence and medical malpractice against Defendants Hamil, Coryell, and Lopez are dismissed without prejudice.

DATED this 31st day of July, 2017.

/s/_________

ROBERT J. BRYAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Goodwin v. Hamil

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Jul 31, 2017
No. 3:17-CV-05183-RJB-DWC (W.D. Wash. Jul. 31, 2017)
Case details for

Goodwin v. Hamil

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP GOODWIN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN HAMIL, LIN-MARIE NACHT, HOLLI CORYELL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Jul 31, 2017

Citations

No. 3:17-CV-05183-RJB-DWC (W.D. Wash. Jul. 31, 2017)