From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodwin v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 17, 2017
3:15-CV-02115-SU (D. Or. Apr. 17, 2017)

Opinion

3:15-CV-02115-SU

04-17-2017

HAROLD GOODWIN, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan issued Findings and Recommendation (#22) on March 28, 2017, in which she recommends the Court affirm the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's application for supplemental security income.

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation (#22). Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the Commissioner's decision and DISMISSES this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 17th day of April, 2017.

/s/_________

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Goodwin v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 17, 2017
3:15-CV-02115-SU (D. Or. Apr. 17, 2017)
Case details for

Goodwin v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD GOODWIN, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Apr 17, 2017

Citations

3:15-CV-02115-SU (D. Or. Apr. 17, 2017)