From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodspeed v. Henderson Police Department

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 6, 2010
2:09-CV-2434 JCM (PAL) (D. Nev. May. 6, 2010)

Opinion

2:09-CV-2434 JCM (PAL).

May 6, 2010


ORDER


Presently before the court are the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen (Doc. #3), filed on April 2, 2010.

Local Rule IB 3-1 states that any party wishing to object to the ruling of the magistrate judge on a pretrial matter shall file a specific objection within ten (10) days from the date of service of the magistrate judge's ruling. Here, no objections were filed.

On October 7, 2008, the court entered an order (Doc. #2) denying plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #1). The court further ordered plaintiff to either file a new completed application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the clerk of the court or pay the filing fee of $350 in full. To date, plaintiff has not submitted a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee.

Upon review of the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations (Doc. #3) and there being no objections filed,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen's (Doc. #3) is AFFIRMED in its entirety. The instant action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Goodspeed v. Henderson Police Department

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 6, 2010
2:09-CV-2434 JCM (PAL) (D. Nev. May. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Goodspeed v. Henderson Police Department

Case Details

Full title:ERIC GOODSPEED, Plaintiff, v. HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: May 6, 2010

Citations

2:09-CV-2434 JCM (PAL) (D. Nev. May. 6, 2010)