From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodson v. Provosk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 6, 2013
9:10-CV-1049 (DNH/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 6, 2013)

Opinion

9:10-CV-1049 (DNH/TWD)

06-06-2013

THOMAS GOODSON, Plaintiff, v. "JOHN" PROVOSK, Correctional Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility; "JOHN" RIO, Correctional Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility; and L. LAVALLEY, Superintendent, Clinton, Defendants.

THOMAS GOODSON Plaintiff, pro se HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN New York State Attorney General Attorney for Respondent CHRISTOPHER W. HALL, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General


APPEARANCES: THOMAS GOODSON
Plaintiff, pro se
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
New York State Attorney General
Attorney for Respondent
CHRISTOPHER W. HALL, ESQ.
Ass't Attorney General
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge

DECISION and ORDER

Plaintiff brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 29, 2013, the Honorable Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, advised, by Report-Recommendation that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted and the complaint be dismissed. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Report-Recommendation.

Based upon a de novo review, the Report-Recommendation is accepted. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; and

2. The complaint is DISMISSED.

The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

United States District Judge
Dated: June 6, 2013

Utica, New York.


Summaries of

Goodson v. Provosk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 6, 2013
9:10-CV-1049 (DNH/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Goodson v. Provosk

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS GOODSON, Plaintiff, v. "JOHN" PROVOSK, Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jun 6, 2013

Citations

9:10-CV-1049 (DNH/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 6, 2013)