From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodson v. Gilmer Oil Refining Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana
Sep 27, 1934
76 S.W.2d 541 (Tex. Civ. App. 1934)

Opinion

No. 4781.

September 27, 1934.

Appeal from District Court, Upshur County; Walter G. Russell, Judge.

Suit by the Gilmer Oil Refining Company and others against S. A. Goodson and others. From an interlocutory order appointing a receiver without notice, the defendants appeal.

Reversed and remanded.

Roy Starnes, of Gladewater, for appellants.

Milton Greer Mell and Gus Morris, both of Gilmer, for appellees.


This appeal is from an interlocutory order appointing a receiver without notice made and entered by the district court of Upshur county, authorizing such receiver to take charge of and operate a certain refinery over which the litigation in the main suit is involved.

The petition for the receiver is signed by the attorney for the plaintiff and verified by him in the following language: "And the facts stated in the said petition are true and correct according to the information and belief of affiant." It is well settled in this state that a petition thus verified does not authorize the appointment of a receiver without a hearing. Alto Cotton Oil Mfg. Co. v. Berryman (Tex.Civ.App.) 218 S.W. 513; Zanes v. Lyons (Tex.Civ.App.) 36 S.W.2d 544.

The judgment of the trial court appointing a receiver is reversed and the cause remanded.


Summaries of

Goodson v. Gilmer Oil Refining Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana
Sep 27, 1934
76 S.W.2d 541 (Tex. Civ. App. 1934)
Case details for

Goodson v. Gilmer Oil Refining Co.

Case Details

Full title:GOODSON et al. v. GILMER OIL REFINING CO

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana

Date published: Sep 27, 1934

Citations

76 S.W.2d 541 (Tex. Civ. App. 1934)

Citing Cases

Holman v. Holman

We believe that such verification is insufficient, and that the appointment of a receiver and the granting of…