From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodson v. Designed Receivable Sols., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SANTA ANA DIVISION
Oct 3, 2016
Case No.: 2:15-CV-03308-JVS (C.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2016)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

granting summary judgment in a TCPA/FDCPA putative class action, prior to addressing a motion for certification, because there was no genuine dispute that the defendant did not violate the named plaintiff's rights under TCPA or FDCPA

Summary of this case from Cahill v. GC Servs. Ltd.
See 2 Summaries

Opinion

Case No.: 2:15-CV-03308-JVS

10-03-2016

SEANA GOODSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. DESIGNED RECEIVABLE SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant.

Mark E. Ellis - 127159 Andrew M. Steinheimer - 200524 Amanda N. Griffith - 288164 ELLIS LAW GROUP LLP 740 University Avenue, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825 Tel: (916) 283-8820 Fax: (916) 283-8821 mellis@ellislawgrp.com asteinheimer@ellislawgrp.com agriffith@ellislawgrp.com Attorneys for Defendant, DESIGNED RECEIVABLE SOLUTIONS, INC.

Honorable James V. Selna United States District Court Judge

Mark E. Ellis - 127159
Andrew M. Steinheimer - 200524
Amanda N. Griffith - 288164
ELLIS LAW GROUP LLP
740 University Avenue, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95825
Tel: (916) 283-8820
Fax: (916) 283-8821
mellis@ellislawgrp.com
asteinheimer@ellislawgrp.com
agriffith@ellislawgrp.com Attorneys for Defendant,
DESIGNED RECEIVABLE SOLUTIONS, INC.

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's September 21, 2016 Order granting Defendant Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (see Docket No. 59), it is HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff Seana Goodson on Plaintiff's entire Complaint. The putative class claims are dismissed without prejudice. Dated: October 03, 2016

By: /s/_________

Honorable James V. Selna

United States District Court Judge

Summaries of

Goodson v. Designed Receivable Sols., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SANTA ANA DIVISION
Oct 3, 2016
Case No.: 2:15-CV-03308-JVS (C.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2016)

granting summary judgment in a TCPA/FDCPA putative class action, prior to addressing a motion for certification, because there was no genuine dispute that the defendant did not violate the named plaintiff's rights under TCPA or FDCPA

Summary of this case from Cahill v. GC Servs. Ltd.

In Goodson v. Designed Receivable Sols, No. CV 15-003308 JVS, 2016 WL 5799321, at *5-6 (C.D. Cal. 2016), the Court found a lack of revocation where the Plaintiff informed the caller that she had already paid the amount being sought, but never asked the caller to "stop calling" or to contact her in a different manner.

Summary of this case from Barnett v. Bank of Am.
Case details for

Goodson v. Designed Receivable Sols., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SEANA GOODSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SANTA ANA DIVISION

Date published: Oct 3, 2016

Citations

Case No.: 2:15-CV-03308-JVS (C.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2016)

Citing Cases

Cahill v. GC Servs. Ltd.

Instead, the only ground on which the Court could conclude at this point that Plaintiff is not a typical…

Barnett v. Bank of Am.

Several cases cited by the Defendant, while not on all fours factually with this case, nonetheless indicate…

2 Citing Cases