Goodson Holdings, LLC v. Titeflex Corp.

Full title: GOODSON HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellant v. TITEFLEX CORPORATION, Appellee

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 7, 2018

2018-1134 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 7, 2018)

Opinion

2018-1134 2018-1149

11-07-2018

GOODSON HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellant v. TITEFLEX CORPORATION, Appellee

MARK STRACHAN, Sayles Werbner, P.C., Dallas, TX, argued for appellant. JAMES L. DAY, JR., Farella Braun + Martel LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by DEEPAK GUPTA.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016-00730, IPR2016-00731.

JUDGMENT

MARK STRACHAN, Sayles Werbner, P.C., Dallas, TX, argued for appellant. JAMES L. DAY, JR., Farella Braun + Martel LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by DEEPAK GUPTA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 7, 2018

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court