From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goods v. Virga

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 3, 2022
2:17-CV-0660-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2022)

Opinion

2:17-CV-0660-JAM-DMC-P

06-03-2022

GREGORY GOODS, Plaintiff, v. TIM V. VIRGA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 44, for an extension of time “to persue [sic] possible settlement through negotiations.” Plaintiff's motion is denied as unnecessary because the parties may pursue settlement discussions without leave of Court and such discussions are not subject to any Court-imposed deadline.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Goods v. Virga

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 3, 2022
2:17-CV-0660-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Goods v. Virga

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY GOODS, Plaintiff, v. TIM V. VIRGA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 3, 2022

Citations

2:17-CV-0660-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2022)