From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodman v. Superior Court

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Jul 13, 1912
19 Cal.App. 457 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912)

Opinion

Civ. No. 1216.

July 13, 1912.

APPLICATION for writ of mandate to the Superior Court in and for Los Angeles County, and N. P. Conrey, Judge thereof.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

H. C. Millsap, for Petitioner.


The affidavit discloses that a certain judgment was rendered against petitioner, as defendant in a certain action brought in the justice's court, on the seventh day of March, 1912, for the sum of $234.60; that thereafter, on the fourteenth day of March, an undertaking was filed in the justice's court staying execution on said judgment, and also an undertaking on appeal; that on the third day of April following a notice of appeal was filed, and thereafter the amount required by law to be paid for the filing of papers on appeal was duly paid; that thereafter, on July 1st, the superior court dismissed the appeal. This application prays for a writ directing the respondents to vacate and set aside the order made and entered dismissing the appeal. We are of opinion that this writ should be denied upon the authority of Rigby v. Superior Court, 162 Cal. 334, [ 122 P. 958]; W. P. Jeffreys Co. v. Superior Court, 13 Cal.App. 193, [ 109 P. 147], and Stimpson Scale Co. v. Superior Court, 12 Cal.App. 539, [ 107 P. 1013].

Application for writ denied.


Summaries of

Goodman v. Superior Court

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Jul 13, 1912
19 Cal.App. 457 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912)
Case details for

Goodman v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:S. B. GOODMAN, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District

Date published: Jul 13, 1912

Citations

19 Cal.App. 457 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912)
126 P. 185

Citing Cases

Dillon v. Superior Court

The adverse party may except to the sufficiency of the sureties within five days after the filing of the…

American Surety Co. of New York v. Superior Court

No possible injury could come to respondent by holding the order of filing to be immaterial so long as the…