Goodman v. Smart Modular Techs., Inc.

Full title: JAMES B. GOODMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SMART MODULAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 5, 2017

2017-1084 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 5, 2017)

Opinion

2017-1084

10-05-2017

JAMES B. GOODMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SMART MODULAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee

DAVID FINK, Fink & Johnson, Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. MICHAEL FRANCIS HEAFEY, Troutman Sanders LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by ANUP M. SHAH, Charlotte, NC.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in No. 4:14-cv-01380, Judge Gray H. Miller.

JUDGMENT

DAVID FINK, Fink & Johnson, Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. MICHAEL FRANCIS HEAFEY, Troutman Sanders LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by ANUP M. SHAH, Charlotte, NC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, PLAGER, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 5, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court