From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodman v. Praxair, Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 12, 2012
471 F. App'x 133 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-1440

04-12-2012

MARC B. GOODMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PRAXAIR, INCORPORATED; PRAXAIR SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees.

Marc B. Goodman, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Bess, VEDDER PRICE, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (1:04-cv-00391-MJG)

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marc B. Goodman, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Bess, VEDDER PRICE, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Marc B. Goodman appeals the district court's order granting partial summary judgment for Defendants, the jury's verdict in favor of Defendants, and the district court's order denying his post-judgment motion for judgment as a matter of law in his breach of contract suit. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Goodman v. Praxair, Inc., No. 1:04-cv-00391-MJG (D. Md. Apr. 2, 2008; Mar. 18, 2009; Nov. 24, 2009; Mar. 30, 2011). We find no basis to recuse the district judge and accordingly deny Goodman's motion that seeks such relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Goodman v. Praxair, Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 12, 2012
471 F. App'x 133 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Goodman v. Praxair, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARC B. GOODMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PRAXAIR, INCORPORATED; PRAXAIR…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 12, 2012

Citations

471 F. App'x 133 (4th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Micro Focus (U.S.), Inc. v. Express Scripts, Inc.

Flawed jury instructions may constitute a proper basis to order a new trial under Rule 59. Goodman v. Praxair…