Goodman v. Panda Express, Inc.

Full title: Liston M. Goodman, an Individual; Plaintiff, v. Panda Express, Inc. d/b/a…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 16, 2022

2:22-cv-24 (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-24

08-16-2022

Liston M. Goodman, an Individual; Plaintiff, v. Panda Express, Inc. d/b/a Panda Express, a Foreign Corporation; Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. d/b/a Panda Express, A Foreign Corporation; Doe Panda Express Employees; Does I through XX, inclusive; and Roe Business Entities I through XX inclusive; Defendant.

MICHAEL P. LOWRY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10666, KEVIN A. BROWN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7621 Attorneys for Panda Express, Inc. Michael P. Lowry, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10666 Attorneys for Panda Express, Inc. Todd Terry, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6519 Attorneys for Liston M. Goodman

RICHARD E. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MICHAEL P. LOWRY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10666, KEVIN A. BROWN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7621 Attorneys for Panda Express, Inc.

Michael P. Lowry, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10666 Attorneys for Panda Express, Inc.

Todd Terry, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6519 Attorneys for Liston M. Goodman

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

RICHARD E. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

The parties stipulate to dismiss all claims in case 2:22-cv-24 with prejudice, each to bear their own fees and costs. No trial date has been set.

IT IS SO ORDERED