Opinion
Case No.: 3:11-CV-2607MMC
11-04-2011
JAMES B. GOODMAN, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, ELPIDA MEMORY, INC., EMERGING MEMORY AND LOGIC SOLUTIONS INC., FIDELIX CO., LTD., INTEGRATED SILICON SOLUTION, INC., and EON SILICON SOLUTIONS INC. Defendants
David Fink (pro hac vice)
FINK & JOHNSON
Duncan M. McNeill (Cal. Bar No. 136416)
Attorneys/or Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant
James B. Goodman
Erik R. Puknys; BarNo. 190926
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
Attorney/or Defendant
Elpida Memory, Inc.
PROPOSED ORDER FOR
STIPULATED
CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL
AS TO ELPIDA MEMORY, INC.
The Court has considered the Stipulated Conditional Dismissal as to Elpida Memory, Inc. and Orders the following:
1. This action as to Elpida is conditionally dismissed without prejudice for thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, and Goodman and Elpida will each bear its own fees and costs.
2. During the aforementioned thirty (30) day period, either Goodman or Elpida may request the Court to reopen the case as to Goodman and Elpida.
3. After the expiration of the aforementioned thirty (30) day period, if neither Goodman or Elpida has submitted a request to reopen to the Court, then this case shall be dismissed with prejudice, and Goodman and Elpida will each bear its own fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Maxine M. Chesney
U.S. District Judge