Opinion
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02607 MMC
11-02-2011
JAMES B. GOODMAN, Plaintiff(s), v. INTEL CORP. ET AL. Defendant(s).
DAVID FINK Attorney for Plaintiff BARRY GRAHAM Attorney for Defendant ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. BRIAN A. DIEZEL Attorney for Defendant Integrated Silicon Solutions, Inc. JAMES VALENTINE Attorney for Defendant Intel Corp.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
[ ] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[×] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Private Process:
[ ] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ____________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
[×] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
[ ] other requested deadline ____________
DAVID FINK
Attorney for Plaintiff
BARRY GRAHAM
Attorney for Defendant
ELPIDA MEMORY, INC.
BRIAN A. DIEZEL
Attorney for Defendant
Integrated Silicon Solutions, Inc.
JAMES VALENTINE
Attorney for Defendant
Intel Corp.
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation." Also, please be sure to complete the [Proposed] Order by checking the process to which the parties have stipulated, and indicating your requested deadline for the ADR session. [PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
[ ] Non-binding Arbitration
[×] Mediation
[ ] Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session
[×] 90 days from the date of this order.
[ ] other ____________
IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE