From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodman v. Intel Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 2, 2011
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02607 MMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02607 MMC

11-02-2011

JAMES B. GOODMAN, Plaintiff(s), v. INTEL CORP. ET AL. Defendant(s).

DAVID FINK Attorney for Plaintiff BARRY GRAHAM Attorney for Defendant ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. BRIAN A. DIEZEL Attorney for Defendant Integrated Silicon Solutions, Inc. JAMES VALENTINE Attorney for Defendant Intel Corp.


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

[ ] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

[×] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

Private Process:

[ ] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ____________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

[×] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

[ ] other requested deadline ____________

DAVID FINK

Attorney for Plaintiff

BARRY GRAHAM

Attorney for Defendant

ELPIDA MEMORY, INC.

BRIAN A. DIEZEL

Attorney for Defendant

Integrated Silicon Solutions, Inc.

JAMES VALENTINE

Attorney for Defendant

Intel Corp.
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation." Also, please be sure to complete the [Proposed] Order by checking the process to which the parties have stipulated, and indicating your requested deadline for the ADR session. [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:

[ ] Non-binding Arbitration

[×] Mediation

[ ] Private ADR

Deadline for ADR session

[×] 90 days from the date of this order.

[ ] other ____________

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Goodman v. Intel Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 2, 2011
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02607 MMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Goodman v. Intel Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES B. GOODMAN, Plaintiff(s), v. INTEL CORP. ET AL. Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 2, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02607 MMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)