From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodman v. Coleman

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 24, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3136 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 24, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3136.

February 24, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2010, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Commonwealth's Answer, inclusive of all exhibits thereto, the other documents filed by the parties and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED and DENIED without an evidentiary hearing; and
3. Petitioner has neither shown a denial of a constitutional right, nor established that reasonable jurists would disagree with this court's disposition of his claims. Consequently, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Goodman v. Coleman

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 24, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3136 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 24, 2010)
Case details for

Goodman v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE FRED GOODMAN, Petitioner v. SUPERINTENDENT COLEMAN, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 24, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3136 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 24, 2010)