From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodling v. Johnson & Johnson

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 10, 2022
4:21-CV-00082 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 10, 2022)

Opinion

4:21-CV-00082

02-10-2022

KIM GOODLING and NORMAN GOODLING, SR., Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

Matthew W. Brann Chief United States District Judge

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 16) is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART:

1. The motion to dismiss as to Counts I (Negligence), II (Design Defect - Negligence & Strict Liability), IV (Failure to Warn - Negligence & Strict Liability), X (Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress), and XIII (Loss of Consortium) is DENIED.
2. The motion to dismiss as to Counts III (Manufacturing Defect - Negligence & Strict Liability), V (Common Law Fraud), VI (Breach of Express Warranty), VIII (Constructive Fraud), and XI (Fraudulent Concealment) is GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If Plaintiffs
Kim Goodling and Norman Goodling, Sr. elect to plead over, they must file the amended complaint on or before March 3, 2022.
3. The motion to dismiss as to Counts VII (Breach of Implied Warranty), IX (Negligent Misrepresentation), XII (Unjust Enrichment), and XIV (Punitive Damages) is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Goodling v. Johnson & Johnson

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 10, 2022
4:21-CV-00082 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Goodling v. Johnson & Johnson

Case Details

Full title:KIM GOODLING and NORMAN GOODLING, SR., Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 10, 2022

Citations

4:21-CV-00082 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 10, 2022)