From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gooden v. Washington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION
Feb 15, 2012
CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-60 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 15, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-60 (WLS)

02-15-2012

JARROD GOODEN, Plaintiff, v. GREGORY WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed January 10, 2012. (Doc. 33). It is recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 28) be denied. (Doc. 33 at 2).

The Report and Recommendation provided the Parties with fourteen (14) days to file written objections to the recommendations therein. (Id. at 3). The period for objections expired on Tuesday, January 24, 2012; no objections have been filed to date. (See Docket).

Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED.

________________________

THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS ,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Gooden v. Washington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION
Feb 15, 2012
CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-60 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Gooden v. Washington

Case Details

Full title:JARROD GOODEN, Plaintiff, v. GREGORY WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION

Date published: Feb 15, 2012

Citations

CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-60 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 15, 2012)