From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gooden v. Lane

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Mar 29, 2023
22-cv-2543 (KMM/LIB) (D. Minn. Mar. 29, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-2543 (KMM/LIB)

03-29-2023

Clifford A. Gooden, III, Petitioner, v. Tim Lane et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Katherine Menendez, United States District Judge.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, dated October 21, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the permitted time period.

In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.Supp.3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] is ACCEPTED;

2. Petitioner's Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED as moot;

3. Petitioner's Motion to Authorize this Court to Obtain the Original Record in the Ensuing Criminal Case [ECF No. 3] is DENIED as moot; and

4. Petitioner's Motion to Stay the state court criminal proceedings [ECF No. 4] is DENIED as moot;

5. This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.


Summaries of

Gooden v. Lane

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Mar 29, 2023
22-cv-2543 (KMM/LIB) (D. Minn. Mar. 29, 2023)
Case details for

Gooden v. Lane

Case Details

Full title:Clifford A. Gooden, III, Petitioner, v. Tim Lane et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Mar 29, 2023

Citations

22-cv-2543 (KMM/LIB) (D. Minn. Mar. 29, 2023)