Goode v. Vision Fin. Corp.

Full title: SHERRI GOODE, Plaintiff, v. VISION FINANCIAL CORP, Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 3, 2015

14 CV 4272 (SJ) (RER) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 3, 2015)

Opinion

14 CV 4272 (SJ) (RER)

08-03-2015

SHERRI GOODE, Plaintiff, v. VISION FINANCIAL CORP, Defendant.

APPEARANCES KIMMEL & SILVERMAN PC 1001 Avenue of the Americas 12th Floor New York, NY 10018 By: Craig Thor Kimmel Attorneys for Plaintiff

JOHNSON, Senior District Judge

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

APPEARANCES KIMMEL & SILVERMAN PC
1001 Avenue of the Americas
12^th Floor
New York, NY 10018
By: Craig Thor Kimmel
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOHNSON, Senior District Judge:

Presently before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("Report") prepared by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes. Judge Reyes issued the Report on May 7, 2015, and provided the parties with the requisite amount of time to file any objections. Neither party filed any objections to the Report. For the reasons stated herein, this Court affirms and adopts the Report in its entirety.

A district court judge may designate a magistrate judge to hear and determine certain motions pending before the Court and to submit to the Court proposed findings of fact and a recommendation as to the disposition of the motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within 10 days of service of the recommendation, any party may file written objections to the magistrate's report. See id. Upon de novo review of those portions of the record to which objections were made, the district court judge may affirm or reject the recommendations. See id. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). In addition, failure to file timely objections may waive the right to appeal this Court's Order. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Small v. Sec'y of Health and Human Servs., 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989).

In this case, objections to Magistrate Judge Reyes' recommendations were due on May 21, 2015. No objections to the Report were filed with this Court. Upon review of the recommendations, this Court adopts and affirms Magistrate Judge Reyes' Report in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 3, 2015

Brooklyn, NY

/s/_________

Sterling Johnson, Jr., U.S.D.J.