From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goode v. Salius

United States District Court, D. Connecticut
Jun 17, 2024
CIVIL 3:24-cv-01010 (KAD) (D. Conn. Jun. 17, 2024)

Opinion

CIVIL 3:24-cv-01010 (KAD)

06-17-2024

Jason Goode, Plaintiff, v. Scott Salius et al., Defendants.


RULING AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

HON. THOMAS O. FARRISH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Jason Goode moves to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. For the reasons explained below, his motion is granted.

A plaintiff filing a complaint in federal court must generally pay a filing fee and an administrative fee that total $405.00. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914. However, a qualifying inmate plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis, meaning that the $55.00 administrative fee is waived and the plaintiff pays the $350.00 filing fee over time. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)-(b). The plaintiff cannot qualify if he has on three or more occasions brought an action that was dismissed “on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” Id. § 1915(g). Here, the issue is whether Mr. Goode qualifies for in forma pauperis status.

To demonstrate eligibility for in forma pauperis status, a plaintiff must submit an affidavit showing that he is “unable to pay” the filing and administrative fees. Id. He must also provide a copy of his prison trust account statement. Id. The statement must cover six months prior to the filing and be certified by a prison official. Id.

A plaintiff is “unable to pay” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 if he cannot pay the total $405.00 fee while also affording the necessities of life. Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948). The plaintiff need not be “absolutely destitute” to qualify for in forma pauperis status. Id.; see also Rosa v. Doe, 86 F.4th 1001, 1008 (2d Cir. 2023) (noting that, when deciding an in forma pauperis motion, the court should consider whether the plaintiff supports dependents, not just whether the plaintiff has enough money to cover the fees). Rather, the affidavit is sufficient if it shows that the plaintiff “cannot because of his poverty” pay the fees “and still be able to provide himself and dependents with the necessities of life.” Adkins, 335 U.S. at 339 (quotation marks omitted).

Mr. Goode cannot afford to pay the filing and administrative fees because his spendable trust account balance is only $26.31. (Prisoner Trust Fund Acct. Stat., ECF No. 4). This does not include the $350.00 set aside for payment of past filings for which he received in forma pauperis status. Id. He indicates that his income is only $30.00 a month. (Mot. for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 2, ECF No. 2).

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.


Summaries of

Goode v. Salius

United States District Court, D. Connecticut
Jun 17, 2024
CIVIL 3:24-cv-01010 (KAD) (D. Conn. Jun. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Goode v. Salius

Case Details

Full title:Jason Goode, Plaintiff, v. Scott Salius et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, D. Connecticut

Date published: Jun 17, 2024

Citations

CIVIL 3:24-cv-01010 (KAD) (D. Conn. Jun. 17, 2024)