From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Good v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Oct 26, 2007
1:07CV178, 1:04CR330-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2007)

Opinion

1:07CV178, 1:04CR330-1.

October 26, 2007


ORDER


On September 6, 2007, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner filed objections to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636.

The Court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's rulings which are affirmed and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (Docket No. 40) is denied, that this action is dismissed, and that finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is denied.


Summaries of

Good v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Oct 26, 2007
1:07CV178, 1:04CR330-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2007)
Case details for

Good v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:SALITO MARQUES GOOD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Oct 26, 2007

Citations

1:07CV178, 1:04CR330-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2007)

Citing Cases

United States v. Greene

Under the common law of North Carolina, the crime of burglary can only take place in "a dwelling house or a…