From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Walgreens

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 22, 2009
24 So. 3d 701 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 1D09-1464.

December 22, 2009.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Shelley Punancy, Judge.

Kimberly A. Hill of Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant.

Linette M. Waterman of Rigell, Waterman Wolfe, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellees.


Upon review of Appellants' response to this court's October 29, 2009, order to show cause, we conclude the order being appealed is a non-appealable, non-final order. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.180(b)(1), Mintz v. Broward Corr. Inst., 800 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Also, although not the basis of our decision, we note the order on appeal lacks any factual or legal findings, thereby rendering meaningful review nearly impossible.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

KAHN, LEWIS and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Walgreens

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 22, 2009
24 So. 3d 701 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Walgreens

Case Details

Full title:Zoraida GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. WALGREENS and Sedgwick Claims Management…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 22, 2009

Citations

24 So. 3d 701 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)