From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Veterans Admin.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
2:15-cv-01997-MCE-DB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)

Opinion

2:15-cv-01997-MCE-DB

09-27-2021

DANIEL GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presently before the Court are a number Motions post-judgment motions filed by Plaintiff. The Government's Request to Strike Plaintiffs “Amended Reply” Brief (ECF No. 157) is DENIED as moot. All filings submitted by Plaintiff purportedly in pro per after counsel noticed his appearance on February 20, 2020, are hereby STRICKEN because Plaintiff is represented by counsel. Any future pro se filings shall be summarily disregarded.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Veterans Admin.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
2:15-cv-01997-MCE-DB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Veterans Admin.

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 27, 2021

Citations

2:15-cv-01997-MCE-DB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)