From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. the Lord Dental

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 16, 2010
79 A.D.3d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 3912.

December 16, 2010.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered February 17, 2010, which denied plaintiffs' motion to vacate an order granting defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with discovery orders, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Della Mura Ciacci, LLP, Bronx (Walter F. Ciacci of counsel), for appellants.

Lewis Johs Avallone Aviles, LLP, New York (Michael G. Kruzynski of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Gonzalez, P.J., Catterson, Acosta, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.


The court properly denied the motion because plaintiffs' excuse of "law office failure" was not credible. The discovery responses that counsel claims would have demonstrated partial compliance with the discovery orders postdated the return date of the motion ( see Tandy Computer Leasing v Video X Home Lib., 124 AD2d 530, 531; Campbell-Jarvis v Alves, 68 AD3d 701). In view of the lack of a reasonable excuse, it is unnecessary to address whether plaintiffs demonstrated a meritorious cause of action ( see Bryant v New York City Hous. Auth., 69 AD3d 488).


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. the Lord Dental

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 16, 2010
79 A.D.3d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. the Lord Dental

Case Details

Full title:MARIA GONZALEZ et al., Appellants, v. PRAISE THE LORD DENTAL et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 16, 2010

Citations

79 A.D.3d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 9342
912 N.Y.S.2d 403

Citing Cases

Liakos v. Spencer

[2] The court providently exercised its discretion in determining that Mary failed to provide a reasonable…

Liakos v. Spencer

The stay of the action that was granted by the court based on Robert's death and the failure to substitute…