E.g., State v. Woodard, 341 S.W.3d 404, 414 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (among other evidence, officer's observation that appellant smelled of alcohol, staggered when walking, and had bloodshot, glazed eyes was arguably sufficient to provide probable cause to arrest appellant for DWI and "certainly provided [the officer] with reasonable suspicion to detain [appellant]"); Gonzalez v. State, No. 08-14-00203-CR, 2017 WL 2464691, at *3-4 (Tex. App.—El Paso June 7, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (appellant's strong odor of alcohol, slurred speech, lack of balance, and bloodshot eyes provided officer with reasonable suspicion to detain appellant for DWI after car crash); State v. Priddy, 321 S.W.3d 82, 88 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2010, pet. ref'd) (officer who observed that appellant had glazed and bloodshot eyes and smelled of alcoholic beverages had reasonable suspicion that appellant had been driving while intoxicated).