From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Pepsico, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jun 13, 2007
CIVIL ACTION No. 06-2163-KHV (D. Kan. Jun. 13, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 06-2163-KHV.

June 13, 2007


ORDER


MeLisa Gonzalez, Mark Haley, Linda Haley, Jenifer Noel Guth, Ryan James Coffelt and Richard Hernandez bring suit against PepsiCo, Inc., Sunny Delight Beverages Co., Rockstar, Inc., Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. and John Doe Companies six through 100. Plaintiffs allege breach of the implied warranty of merchantability under Article II of the Kansas Uniform Commercial Code, K.S.A. § 84-2-101 et seq. (Count I), unfair trade practices under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act ("KCPA"), K.S.A. § 50-623 et seq. (Count II), and unjust enrichment (Count III). On May 24, 2007, the Court ordered plaintiffs to show good cause in writing on or before June 8, 2007, why it should not dismiss for failure to plead with particularity their KCPA claim against the John Doe defendants. See Memorandum And Order And Order To Show Cause (Doc. #78) at 20 n. 13. Plaintiffs have not responded. Accordingly, for substantially the reasons set forth in its previous order, the Court dismisses plaintiffs' KCPA claim against John Doe Companies six through 100.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Pepsico, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jun 13, 2007
CIVIL ACTION No. 06-2163-KHV (D. Kan. Jun. 13, 2007)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Pepsico, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MELISA GONZALEZ, individually and on behalf of a class and subclass of…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Jun 13, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 06-2163-KHV (D. Kan. Jun. 13, 2007)