Opinion
March 31, 1999
Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, Jr., J. — Summary Judgment.
PRESENT: HAYES, J. P., WISNER, PIGOTT, JR., SCUDDER AND CALLAHAN, JJ.
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiffs' motion to renew although plaintiffs offered no explanation for their failure to submit certain documents at the time of the original motions and cross motion ( see, Lesanti v. Harmac Indus., 175 A.D.2d 664). Upon renewal, the court properly concluded that a factual issue exists whether plaintiff Joseph Gonzalez, who was dismantling air conditioning ductwork in the computer room of a bank, was engaged in demolition work, as that term is defined in 12 NYCRR 23-1.4 (b) (16) ( cf., Casale v. Washington Mills Electro Mineral Corp., 216 A.D.2d 881, 882). Plaintiffs allege that defendants violated 12 NYCRR 23-3.3 (e), which is sufficiently specific to support a cause of action under Labor Law § 241 (6) ( see generally, Jackson v. Williamsville Cent. School Dist., 229 A.D.2d 985, 986). Consequently, those portions of the motions and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action were properly denied upon renewal.