From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Kinney

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 23, 2006
CV F 05 0135O OWW WMW P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2006)

Opinion

CV F 05 0135O OWW WMW P.

February 23, 2006


ORDER RE: FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS (#5)


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On January 10, 2006, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on January 10, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Kinney

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 23, 2006
CV F 05 0135O OWW WMW P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2006)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Kinney

Case Details

Full title:RAUL GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT KINNEY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 23, 2006

Citations

CV F 05 0135O OWW WMW P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2006)