From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

United States District Court Central District of California
Jan 9, 2020
Case No. 2:17-CV-09310-ODW (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:17-CV-09310-ODW (ASx)

01-09-2020

FELIPE GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT [86]

JUDGMENT

In light of the Court's Orders granting Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Federal National Mortgage Association, NDeX WEST, LLC, and Rushmore Loan Management Services's (collectively "Defendants") motions to dismiss with prejudice (ECF Nos. 64, 68, 82),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:

1. Judgment for Defendants on Plaintiff's First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, Twelfth, and Thirteenth claims for relief against Plaintiff;

2. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs;

3. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

January 9, 2020

/s/ _________

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

United States District Court Central District of California
Jan 9, 2020
Case No. 2:17-CV-09310-ODW (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2020)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

Case Details

Full title:FELIPE GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., et al.…

Court:United States District Court Central District of California

Date published: Jan 9, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:17-CV-09310-ODW (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2020)