From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. JMH Ventures

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Apr 7, 2011
No. 02-11-00022-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2011)

Opinion

No. 02-11-00022-CV

Delivered: April 7, 2011.

Appealed from County Court at Law No. 1 of Tarrant County.

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On March 9, 2011, we notified appellants that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk's record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellants, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk's record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellants have not made payment arrangements for the clerk's record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellants shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. JMH Ventures

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Apr 7, 2011
No. 02-11-00022-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. JMH Ventures

Case Details

Full title:JAVIER GONZALEZ, IRMA GONZALEZ AND ALL OCCUPANTS, APPELLANTS v. JMH…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Apr 7, 2011

Citations

No. 02-11-00022-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2011)