Summary
In Iocovello, we held that the City of New York was not entitled to an offset under CPLR 4545 against a former police officer's lost earnings awards based on his accident disability pension because "the City failed to demonstrate with reasonable certainty that the accident retirement benefits at issue will replace those awards" (249 A.D.2d at 144).
Summary of this case from Johnson v. N.Y.C. Tr. AuthOpinion
April 21, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Friedman, J.).
The City's claims that General Municipal Law § 205-e and its legislative history preclude "fellow-officer" suits against it within the context of an employer/employee relationship, and, in this same connection, that the benefits it provides are comparable to workers' compensation ( see, General Municipal Law § 205-e; General Obligations Law § 11-106), are without merit ( see, Gleavy v. City of New York, 240 A.D.2d 700, lv denied App. Div., 2d Dept, Oct. 16, 1997, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13208; Galapo v. City of New York, 219 A.D.2d 581; Kelly v. City of New York, 240 A.D.2d 709, lv denied App. Div, 2d Dept, Oct. 16, 1997, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13575).
The trial court properly determined that Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 (b) and (e) were permissible statutory predicates for plaintiff's General Municipal Law § 205-e cause of action ( see, Szczerbiak v. Pilat, 90 N.Y.2d 553, 556-557; Kelly v. City of New York, supra; see also, Hudson v. Boutin, 239 A.D.2d 624).
Contrary to the City's claim, the verdict was legally sufficient and was supported by the weight of the evidence ( see, Szczerbiak v. Pilat, 90 N.Y.2d, supra, at 557; Mattera v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 245 A.D.2d 274; compare, Hudson v. Boutin, supra; Mulligan v. City of New York, 245 A.D.2d 277).
The trial court properly denied the City's motion to reduce the award for past and future lost earnings by the amount of the plaintiff's accident disability pension, since the City failed to demonstrate with reasonable certainty that the accident retirement benefits at issue will replace those awards ( see, CPLR 4545 [c]; Oden v. Chemung County Indus. Dev. Agency, 87 N.Y.2d 81, 87).
Respecting application of the 4% annual annuity adjustment provided for by CPLR 5041 (e), we note that, contrary to the City's appellate claim, the adjustment was properly computed after each of the awards was reduced to present value.
Finally, since, as plaintiff concedes, the trial court erred when it determined that it lacked discretion to direct that interest upon the judgment be computed at a rate lower that 9% per annum ( see, Rodriguez v. New York City Hous. Auth., 91 N.Y.2d 76), the portions of the judgment in which interest is computed at a 9% annual rate should be vacated and the matter remanded to the trial court for a discretionary determination of the appropriate interest rate and, if necessary, for a recomputation of interest on the awards.
We have considered the City's remaining arguments and find that they lack merit.
Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Tom and Andrias, JJ.