From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 26, 2016
Case No. SACV 14-1513-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. SACV 14-1513-FMO (JEM)

10-26-2016

HUMBERTO ARREOLA GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: October 26, 2016

/s/_________

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 26, 2016
Case No. SACV 14-1513-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2016)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:HUMBERTO ARREOLA GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 26, 2016

Citations

Case No. SACV 14-1513-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2016)