From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Hernandez-Melendez

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 13, 2021
21-cv-05530-JD (N.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-05530-JD

09-13-2021

SERGIO STEVEN VASQUEZ GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. ARTURO HERNANDEZ-MELENDEZ, Defendant.


ORDER RE DISMISSAL

JAMES DCMTO United States District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner acting pro se, filed a writ of mandamus seeking money damages from the attorney who represented him in his criminal case. Plaintiff was sent a notice that he had not paid the filing fee or submitted a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). He was provided twenty-eight days to correct these deficiencies. More than twenty-eight days has passed, and plaintiff has not paid the fee, filed a complete application to proceed IFP or otherwise communicated with the Court. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Hernandez-Melendez

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 13, 2021
21-cv-05530-JD (N.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Hernandez-Melendez

Case Details

Full title:SERGIO STEVEN VASQUEZ GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. ARTURO HERNANDEZ-MELENDEZ…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 13, 2021

Citations

21-cv-05530-JD (N.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2021)